Issam Khalidi
As Inside Word Football reported, the FIFA Council, the
organization's top decision-making body, held its penultimate meeting on
Thursday October 2nd, but didn't talk about either Israel's potential ban or
settlement clubs in the West Bank, which were first raised by the Palestinian
FA (PFA) in 2013.
Instead, Infantino and his Council offered a message of
peace. Infantino said: “At FIFA, we are committed to using the power of
football to bring people together in a divided world. Our thoughts are with
those who are suffering in the many conflicts that exist around the world
today, and the most important message that football can convey right now is one
of peace and unity.”
“FIFA cannot solve geopolitical problems, but it can and
must promote football around the world by harnessing its unifying, educational,
cultural and humanitarian values.”
After the meeting, Infantino posed for a photo with PFA
president Jibril Rajoub (pictured left). Reducing the occasion to another photo
op, he wrote on Instagram: “I commend President Rajoub and the PFA for their
resilience at this time and I reiterated to him FIFA’s commitment to using the
power of football to bring people together in a divided world.”
The PFA has repeatedly sought to suspend Israel, including at last year’s FIFA Congress in Bangkok, Thailand. FIFA president Gianni Infantino ordered an “independent legal analysis” of Palestine’s complaint, which was passed to the disciplinary and governance committees last October.
A few questions come to mind here; the first one is why did FIFA
immediately sanction Russia four days after the Ukraine invasion?
As FIFA's president, Infantino believes
I find it strange that Infantino seems to have adopted the same approach to power that Trump has adapted to his
How can football convey a message of peace
and unity in a world where the entire sports infrastructure has been destroyed
and hundreds of athletes and players have been killed, most recently Suleiman
al-Obeid, the “Pele of Palestine”?
Certainly, the appropriate way to express compassion for those affected by the genocide (or those affected by the many conflicts around the world - as Infantino describes it) is to impose sanctions and punish Israel for its actions and crimes.
In its latest decision, FIFA rejected the idea of banning settlements from taking part in Israeli football league. Thus, this rejection violates international and UN law, as well as FIFA's rules and regulations. Andreas Zimmermann, professor of international law at the University of Potsdam, Germany, points out that the jurisprudence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (‘CAS’), and FIFA’s own practice, establish that territory under FIFA Statutes is defined by reference to international law. Accordingly, Israeli settlement clubs playing on occupied Palestinian territory without PFA’s consent violate Art. 72, para. 2 FIFA Statutes. Furthermore, FIFA’s tolerance of settlement clubs implicitly recognizes Israeli settlements, and thus violates FIFA’s duty to respect the Palestinians’ right to self-determination under Art. 3 FIFA Statutes.

No comments:
Post a Comment